Off, off, off: an improbable defence of Roberto Mancini

What, exactly, is un-English about standing by the side of the football pitch and waving an imaginary card when a player from your side goes down under a crude tackle?

It is widely reported that Roberto Mancini has been warned he could face FA disciplinary action if he persists in gesticulating towards referees in an attempt to persuade him to send off offending opponents.

* Photograph by Elliott Brown. See his Flickr pages here.

Salut! Sunderland has campaigned throughout its five years of existence against cheating of all kinds in football. We make no pretence that it is something only the opposition would stoop to; when Sunderland’s own players appear to have been guilty, we say so.

The question asked of each “Who are You?” candidate, supporters of the teams Sunderland are about to play, is essentially “what form of cheating most annoys you and what should be done about it?”. It shows how seriously we take this ugly blot on the modern game. In 90 per cent or more cases, the responses suggest supporters generally share our contempt for players who dive, feign injury and attempt to intimidate match officials.

But touchline antics of the sort favoured by Mancini, while hardly edifying, do not constitute cheating. If lively, partisan crowds are entitled to chant “Off, off, off”, as they have done more or less throughout living memory without being accused adopting un-English ways, why should a manager face sanctions for doing the same? It is a natural human response to the injustice of seeing your team denied by foul methods. The crowd is often wrong, of course. But you may as well call for the outlawing of all football chants, to avoid players being artificially motivated or demoralised by the din.

What is significantly different from what happens off the field of play, however, is for a player to do the air card-brandishing on the pitch in the course of a game.

Once again, this is a custom commonly attributed to players from overseas, though it is probably not necessary to attend too many games to see that this apportionment of blame, too, is mistaken; it may have started abroad, but is something English players, led by the inelegant figure of Wayne Rooney, have enthusiastically adopted. And it is wrong. What makes it more wrong than the crowd, or people in the technical areas, doing it is the close proximity of player to referee, and the player’s direct participation in the game itself.

To get the best out of Salut! Sunderland, click here for the home page and bookmark it. That way, you see all the most recent articles …

I make one concession here: a team captain’s rights to approach the referee should include the right to argue, once and without abusive or aggressive language or gestures, that an opponent deserves punishment in the interests of natural justice and/or consistency. Referees are perfectly able to judge what amounts to an appropriate approach and what does not. Any player who is not his team’s captain and waves an imaginary card should instantly be shown one himself.

But diving and feigning injury are far more serious matters and ought to figure much higher in the FA’s sense of priority.

If we are still not ready for the use of video technology while a game is in progress, there is nothing to stop the authorities reviewing footage after the event and determining whether player X or Y tried to hoodwink match officials. If the answer is Yes, and the conduct has not already been the subject of a card by the referee, retrospective punishment should be imposed.

I would also like to see an intelligent response to the feigning of injury, which often precedes the card-waving and is accordingly a greater breach of the principles of fair play.

One suggestion already made here is that a player who goes down in apparent agony should automatically be substituted. If he is as badly hurt as seems the case, he needs urgent attention and is plainly unfit to continue; if he is not hurt, he can hardly complain about bring treated as if his bogus cries of pain were genuine. Again, a referee should be trusted to judge each case on merit.

But to return to the case if Roberto Mancini, I can see no pressing need for action to stop his card trick – not, at any rate, until the FA has demonstrated some desire to tackle far more objectionable footballing practices.

Monsieur Salut
Share this post

6 thoughts on “Off, off, off: an improbable defence of Roberto Mancini”

  1. I don’t agree with ‘Air-Carding’, but more so, I don’t agree with Mancini’s cascading grey hair- flowing Rapunzel-like down the back of his neck and resting on his baby-blue and white scarf. He looks like the city prick who barges in front of you at Fenchurch Street to get ‘the best seat on the train’. Ponce.
    Also, if a player goes down in apparent agony, then within seconds of the restart leaps to his feet and carries on, sans wince, then the ref should produce a card… a card emblazoned with daisies and pansies, with little ribbons on each corner, billowing in the wind.
    Fucking tarts. You don’t get that in Sunday league, etc etc…

  2. I don’t like the imaginary card- waving especially by players on the pitch,but what I absolutely despise is the over-reaction and blatant play-acting following a more often than not hard yet fair tackle.If the FA were serious about improving the game, a series of retrospective punishments for what is after all cheating would rid our game of this blight within a couple of months at best.I can’t defend Mancini but as the article implies there are far more important issues at stake here

  3. M salut – cannot agree with the argument that imaginary red card waving is anything other than unacceptable. I also think that anyone who brandishes an imaginary card should shown one themselves player or coach/manager.

    Joan – often a player has to leave the field because of a real injury sustained because of a foul committed by an opponent. It’s bad enough when a player who is fouled can’t take a penalty because he has had to leave the pitch after treatment or the non offending side has to play on a man short for a while.

    I agree feigning injury is despicable but your suggestion would not be workable.

  4. I agree with reviewing evidence and imposing sanctions for cheating. Harder to prove that someone was feigning injury – we’ve all stubbed our toe and hopped around in agony then been fine a few minutes later, but maybe players should have to go off for 5 minutes, and not be waved straight back on as they are now

  5. Waving imaginary cards is, to me, amongst the most infuriating things that has crept into the modern game and yet is one that, IMHO, could be one of the easiest to remove, once and for all.

    It would only take referees to be instructed to, automatically, issue the same colour card that is being requested to the player (or manager/coach) that suggested it for the practice to disappear very quickly!

    If they sometimes then mistake a request for yellow as red then so much the better!!

Comments are closed.

Next Post