Sixer’s Sevens: Stoke City 3 SAFC 2

pete2

Almost every week Pete Sixsmith offers his inimitable seven-word verdict on our games. When, rarely, Pete is absent, a supersub does it for him. The full archive – see link below – encapsulates the matchday experiences, from darkest gloom to sublime elation, of a fan who is usually there …

Feb 5 2011 Stoke City (1) 3 SAFC (1) 2 Take your pick: Horrible result against a truly horrible team or A refereeing performance that defies reasonable analysis

Feb 1 2011 SAFC (2) 2 Chelsea (2) 4 Cracking game deservedly won by arrogant Blues

Jan 22 2011 Blackpool (0) 1 SAFC (2) 2 Excellent first half but tight at end

Jan 16 2011 SAFC (0) 1 Newcastle United (0) 1 Bacon saved by Gyan but scarcely deserved

Jan 8 2011 FA Cup Third Round: SAFC (0) 1 Notts County (1) 2* No excuse for failing in such fashion 

Jan 5 2011 Aston Villa (0) 0 SAFC (0) 1 Take your pick between 1) Bob and Tim Chapman: * Aerial battle settled by Bardsley super strike or 2) Sobs: * Deserved battling win – but at what cost?


To see Sixer’s Sevens in full, click here. If an asterisk precedes the comment, the words that follow are the work of someone else because Pete is for once absent from the game or his verdict has been delayed …

Share this post

5 thoughts on “Sixer’s Sevens: Stoke City 3 SAFC 2”

  1. Again, you’re missing the point. Read my comments elsewhere that nobody should have been sent off, just pointing out that we can all bang on about this foul and that foul and whatever and that can lead you to develop daft conclusions, like yours for example.

  2. And I’ve just checked and there was no mention of ‘refereeing performance’ when you watched the home game against us. I don’t know about seven words. More than one eye would be a help

  3. The ref did OK. I thought if he was biased he would have sent off Muntari and Henderson but we can all point out things in games. Thanks for the kind comments about our ‘horrible team’. I won’t bother contributing again.

Comments are closed.

Next Post