Wes Brown and the limited benefits of a post-execution free pardon

A key man, says Jake, and innocent
A key man, says Jake, and innocent


You’ve just been hanged
for a crime you didn’t commit. “Don’t despair,” someone shouted, the last sound you would ever hear, as the trapdoor opened. “There’s an appeal in.”

So Wes Brown’s name is cleared. The trapdoor opened long ago; the corpse of Sunderland’s defeat at Stoke has already been moved to the plot reserved for burials of the executed. Exhumation, and a proper place of rest, won’t bring back Wes’s second half at the Britannia any more than a posthumous pardon or acquittal will restore life to the hanged man.

I have been uncharacteristically charitable towards Kevin Friend in my piece for ESPNFC.com. I cannot imagine many here will support me.

I am as angry as anyone. I will feel angrier still come May if we go down by, say, one point. Saturday’s game was there to be drawn or even won, even at 1-0. A penalty for the assault that might have dispatched Steven Fletcher to the A&E ward of the University Hospital of North Staffs would have made it 1-1 and, surely 10 vs 10. Friend made two disgraceful decisions that may – we can never be sure – have cost us the match.

But that’s it. He is shamed by the annulment of his red card for Brown. He loses matchday fees while excluded from Premier action. We get Wes back, but not the point/s.

And yet … who is principally to blame for Sunderland’s woeful predicament? Friend, Marriner, Atkinson, MArk Hughes, Charlie Adam? Or Ellis Short, PDC and the players? While we’re at it, let’s incriminate MON and Bruce, too. Poyet’s record before Stoke – P4 W2 D0 L2 Pts 6, plus passage to the next round of the league cup – means he cannot sensibly be blamed for anything.

I won’t bore you with much of what I’ve said at ESPN. You’ll go there if you wish and read the lot and maybe even leave a comment. But this was my conclusion:

Friend’s performance at Stoke was abysmal as he may well now recognise. But perhaps we should be kinder to refs, and a lot less kind towards the handsomely rewarded players who, much more than officials, break our hearts so often.

Monsieur Salut in Paris days, as seen by Matt
Monsieur Salut in Paris days, as seen by Matt


Join the Salut! Sunderland Facebook group – click anywhere along this line



And follow us on Twitter: @salutsunderland … click along this line

Click anywhere on this sentence for a glance at the home page – and highlights of all the most recent articles …

Jake flags the new feature allowing you to have your say on topic or off
Jake flags the new feature allowing you to have your say on topic or off

Fancy leaving a comment? Not sure what you have to say fits this post? Go to the new feature – https://safc.blog/2013/07/salut-sunderland-the-way-it-is/ – and say it there.

Share this post

3 thoughts on “Wes Brown and the limited benefits of a post-execution free pardon”

  1. Well Poyets said today that refs are human and make mistakes…….. so we should too.Over a season the incompetences balance out.We should not get so het up about it,and worry more about out teams performances as that is what is going to save us, not refereeing decisions.

    No team ever said it was all the refs fault after 38 games,if you are in the bottom 3 it is because the team failed.

  2. M.Salut wrote

    ‘I will feel angrier still come May if we go down by, say, one point’

    ‘Come May’ – based on current form, lady luck or sods law (for all those who don’t believe in luck), plus PL officiating, as Monty said before Arnhem

    ‘it will all be over before Christmas’!

    The Picture of Wes running through walls is good though.

Comments are closed.

Next Post