Sixer’s West Brom Soapbox: well at least we didn’t lose

Malcolm Dawson writes…..

Jake: 'better, but no cigar'
Jake: ‘better, but no cigar’
“you must be pretty confident today” I said to the West Brom father and son combo as we grabbed a burger on our way up Millennium Way.

His reply “Not really – this looks like a nil nil,” led to my asking about his thoughts on Pulis and he admitted that although not his first choice the new manager had quickly got them organised and playing together. “He’ll have them sitting back and playing for the point,” was his spot on prediction. I probably enjoyed the burger slightly more than the game though not much more. It wasn’t a classic (burger or game) but if we’re going to draw 0-0 I’d rather we did it looking to get forward and win rather than by sitting back and risk defeat. West Brom rarely threatened and never looked liked scoring and we played most of the match in their half. But Johnson’s effort apart Ben Foster had a pretty easy time of it. He had one moment of nervousness after a cracking shot from Larsson but apart from that his only contribution was to catch the ball, run forward a few yards then throw himself on the ground unchallenged writhing around in agony as a vital few minutes ticked away. Pete Sixsmith was there and his post match comment to me “at least we didn’t lose” summed it up nicely. His slightly longer and more erudite take on things is here…..


It was better than Queens Park Rangers and it was better than Bradford City – but really, it wasn’t very good as we huffed and puffed our way to an uninspiring goalless draw with an equally uninspired West Brom team who will be down there with us until the end of May.

There was an improvement. We never looked like conceding and we worked hard, particularly Seb Larsson, who is probably our outstanding player this season. He ran and ran and ran, urging the other players on and showing why he deserved his contract extension last year. However, all Larsson’s excellent running in midfield is to no avail if we have no creativity there – and we haven’t. His partnership with Cattermole (good to see him back) may well be crucial in keeping us in this league for another season of mediocrity, but the lack of players who can open up a defence is worrying.

Jake: 'Lee Cattermole - good to see him back."'
Jake: ‘Lee Cattermole – good to see him back.”‘

Alvarez shows signs of being able to do it, but he is frustratingly ineffective, often running up blind alleys and wanting to beat a man twice or even thrice. Do we persevere with him and hope that he comes good? We don’t seem to have much else , as Giaccherini appears to have succumbed to an endless series of ankle injuries. Johnson equally tried to open up a resolute and physical Baggies defence but he too got nowhere. Pulis has his midfield and defence so well organised that they fill any space available and it needs a quick killer pass to get round them – but we don’t do that.

After match discussion centred around the officials, as it usually does. Unlike Mourinho, both Poyet and Pulis voiced their opinions on the incident that could have been the turning point. According to Pulis, “old ladies on the high street take more of a knock than that and stay on their feet”, a statement which won’t win him many friends in the old lady department. Poyet, like 40,000 Sunderland supporters, thought it was a red card as Lescott denied a clear goal scoring opportunity and he was the last man. Initially, Mike Jones didn’t give it, but his assistant flagged, we hoped for a penalty and expected Lescott to troop off. We got neither, one rightly, the other wrongly. If it was a foul, it had to be a red; yet another serious error by an official and one which may prove to be very expensive.

The assistant then got himself in the old ladies’ least favourite manager’s good books when he gave Adam Johnson offside as he slotted home Ricky Alvarez’s clever pass. Those who stayed up late to watch MOTD know that Mr Hatzidakis got it wrong. No gifts from this man with a Greek sounding name.

The rest of the game trundled on and the crowd retreated into their coats as a cold wind swept the stadium. A flock of seagulls (real ones, not the ridiculously coiffured 80’s pop group) swept and soared and could have nested in either penalty area, there was so little happening.

Not quite a stinker in the QPR class or a disaster in the Bradford mould, but another lost opportunity and it means that we need to take points from the next two away games at Old Trafford and the KC Stadium. To do that, we need to display some creativity and urgency to go with the undoubted effort and commitment that the players showed on Saturday. The crowd got behind them and showed that they wanted manager and players to succeed.

But, as I often remind students, wanting to do well and actually doing it are two completely different things. At the moment, we are struggling to get a worthwhile grade in our annual relegation exam. The fear is still there that we might fail it this year.

Read M Salut’s ESPN report here!

Join the Salut! Sunderland Facebook group – click anywhere along this line

And follow us on Twitter: @salutsunderland … click along this line

Click anywhere on this sentence for a glance at the home page – and highlights of all the most recent articles …

Jake flags the new feature allowing you to have your say on topic or off
Jake flags the new feature allowing you to have your say on topic or off

Fancy leaving a comment? Not sure what you have to say fits this post? Go to the made-for-purpose feature – – and say it there

5 thoughts on “Sixer’s West Brom Soapbox: well at least we didn’t lose”

  1. Baggies fan in peace. Thankfully I didn’t have the displeasure of watching the game, but saw the extended highlights. Very Tony Pulis style away performance – the type I avoided like the plague when he was manager of Stoke (this being the only game I refused to go to as a home season ticket holder).

    As for the Lescott incident, firstly, I don’t believe it was a foul. There was minimal contact, if any. Secondly, just because he gave the foul, doesn’t mean he has to send the player off. There needed to be an obvious goal scoring opportunity, and that cart horse Graham didn’t stand any chance of connecting with the through ball.

    • Hate to admit it Tbags but I agree with your summation of the Lescott incident. But the ref let a lot of physical stuff go all game – Wes Brown picked up on this and got away with a lot of shoving outside the penalty box. Lescott, Dawson and others were more blatant in the area but had obviously worked out they wouldn’t get punished.

    • The Johnson disallowed goal was the main bug bare for me, the last thing we needed . Graham went over far too easily but West Brom reverted to Stokes old rugby style on Saturday . Maybe we should try that at old Trafford and see if our entire team can get booked , with at least three sendings off . I’m being over dramatic of course, but I’m just trying to illustrate the belief among we Sunderland fans that we don’t get a fair crack of the whip when it comes to decisions . We can’t even get home town decisions against fellow unglamorous clubs like yourselves .

  2. I can understand officials making split second errors but I cannot excuse cowardice. You cannot warn a team 5 times for cheating and not punish them once. Just give 1 penalty for their persistent hugging and eventually it stops.

  3. Good assesment, as for us taking points from Old Trafford and the theatre of doom the KC . Expect us to adopt the Pulis park the bus method ,two more valuable nil nils are within touching distance !

Comments are closed.

Next Post